You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL RISKS IN NANOTECHNOLOGIES AT WORKPLACES USING E-BEAM DEVICE UE-202

2(35) 2013

DOI xxxxxxxx

Demetska O. V.1, Tkachenko T. Yu.1, Movchan V. A.1, Andrusyshyna I. M.1, Vasilyev V. I.2

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL RISKS IN NANOTECHNOLOGIES AT WORKPLACES USING E-BEAM DEVICE UE-202

1 SI «Institute for Occupational Health of NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv
2 Institute of Physics of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

Full article (PDF), UKR

Background. The number of people, who contact professionally with nanomaterials, permanently increases. Purpose. To evaluate potential risk for an operator at workplace in the use of the E-beam device UE-202 in manufacturing nanomaterials and nanopowders. Materials and methods. The chemical analysis of samples was carried out by ІСР-АЕС method, using the spectrometer Optima 2100 DV. The concentration of nanoparticles in the working zone air was measured with the diffusion aerosol spectrometer DAS-2702. The risk was evaluated using a «control banding» method. Results. The maximum concen-trations of particles with sizes between 1 and 100 nm exceeded the test levels on conditions of ceasing the work with the E-beam device in the closed camera. The concentrations of the nanosized nickel, chromium, and zinc exceeded the calcu¬lated TLVs for nanomaterials even on conditions, when «macrosubstance» concentrations did not exceed TLVs. On the con¬trary, the calculated risk levels of the combined effect indicate the absence of the adverse effect on workers (on conditions of the device stopping and its working in the warm season). Conclusions. The closed technological process of nanoparticles manufacturing does not always guarantee the safety for workers. When evaluating the risk at workplace, where nanotechnolo¬gies are used, the information on the mass concentration of the nanosized substances is more useful than the data about the number of particles. The risk minimization measures have been proposed.

Key words: nanotechnology, nanoparticles, working zone air, potentional risk

References

  1. Demetska O. V. (2011), “Assessment of risks in the field of nanotechnology”, Ukrainian Journal of Occupational Health, 1, 36-43.
  2. Balbus J. M. Meeting Report: Hazard assessment for nanoparticles - Report from an interdisciplinary Workshop / J. M. Balbus, A. D. Maynard, V. L. Colvin // Envir. Health Persp.- 2007.- V. 115, No 11.-P. 1664-1669.
  3. BSI-British Standards, Nanotechnologies - Part 2: Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials. PD 6699-2: 2007, BSI 2007.
  4. Kuempel E. D. Risk Assessment Approaches and Research Needs for Nanomaterials: An Examination of Data and Information from Current Studies / Kuempel E. D., Geraci C. L., Schulte P. A. // NATO Security through Science Series Book.- 2007.- Р. 119-145.
  5. Paic S. Y. Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures / S. Y. Paik, D. M. Zalk, P. Swuste // Ann. Occup. Hyg.- 2008.- V. 52, No 6.- P. 419-428.
  6. http://www.dguv.de/ifa/en/fac/nanopartikel/beurteilungsmassstaebe/index.jsp
  7. http://www.dguv.de/ifa/en/fac/nanopartikel/messtechnik/index.jsp
  8. http://www.uzmzcge.by/_files/news/risky.doc
  9. http://wwwwho.mt/fcte/text_download/ru/mdex.html