You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN OCCUPATIONAL ASTHENOPIA AND THE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF VISUAL FATIGUE FOR VDT WORKERS

https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2007.04.071

Ustinaviciene Ruta1, Januskevicius Vidmantas2

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN OCCUPATIONAL ASTHENOPIA AND THE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF VISUAL FATIGUE FOR VDT WORKERS

1Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania

2 Department of Health Systems Research of Institute of Biomedical Research, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania

Full article (PDF), ENG

To evaluate the relationship of functional visual fatigue parameters with the symptoms of asthenopia, and to determine association between subjective and the objective indicators of eye fatigue. 404 office workers with and without VDT work were selected for the inclusion in the study. To evaluate visual fatigue was used questionnaire for subjective complaints and measurement of main ophtalmological indicators. Psychophysiological studies determine changes in the sensomotoric reactions during the working day and the working week; in addition to that, studies of the constancy of clear-unclear vision and the fluctuation of the clear and unclear vision periods were performed. Measurements of psychophysiological changes were taken over one week, three times per day, for five days in a row. The questionnaire data showed that 88.4% of all employees complained of various vision disorders. Our psychophysiological findings showed that during the second hall'of the working day, when general fatigue and asthenopia develops, ophthalmologic indications change: visual sensomotor reaction becomes slower, the duration of the periods of unclear vision increases, and the change of the periods of clear and unclear vision becomes faster. Changes in the ocular and psychophysiological functions before and at the end of the workday, as determined in our study, provide a good objective index ofVDT-induced «ocular» and central nervous system fatigue, can be used for intervention research.

Key words: Ergophtalmology, Visual fatigue, Occupational asthenopia, VDT work, Eye discomforts, Psychophysiology

References

  1. Mocci F., Serra A. Psychological factors and visual fatigue in working with video display terminals. Occup Environ Med 2001; 58: 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.4.267
  2. Bergquist U. Video display terminals and health. A technical and medical appraisal of the state of the art. ScandJ Work Environ Health. 1984: 10. suppl 2: 1-87.
  3. Bergqvist U., Knave B. Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994: 20 (1): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1432
  4. Bergquist U., Knave B., VossM., Wibom R. A longitudinal study of VDT work and health // Int. J. Human Computer Interaction.- 1992: 4: 197 -219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319209526036
  5. Scalet E. VDT health and safety, issues and solutions. By Ergosyst Associates. 1987.
  6. Nakaishi H., Yamada Y. Abnormal tear dynamics and symptoms of eyestrain in operators of visual display terminals. Occup Environ Med. 1999: 56 (1): 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.1.6
  7. Gobba FM. Broglia A. Sarti R. Luberto F. Cavalleri A. Visual fatigue in video display terminal operators: objective measure and relation to environmental conditions. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988: 60 (2): 81-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381485
  8. Hanne W., Brewitt H. Changes in visual function caused by work at a data display terminal. Ophthalmologe. 1994: 91 (1): 107-12 (in German with English abstract).
  9. Lantsburg M.E. Moikin I.V. Rozenblium 1 Z., The dependence of the degree of visual fatigue on the shift duration in work with video terminals and an assessment of the efficacy of preventive measures Gig TV Prof Zabol. 1992: 4: 12-5 (In Russian with English abstract).
  10. Saito S., Sotoyama M., Salto S., Taptagapom S. Physiological indices of visual fatigue due to VDT operation: pupillary reflexes and accommodative responses. Ind Health. 1994: 32 (2): 57-66. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.32.57
  11. Murata K., Araki S., Yokoyama K., Yamashita K., Okumatsu T., Sakou S. Accumulation of VDT work-related visual fatigue assessed by visual evoked potential. near point distance and critical flicker fusion. Ind Health. 1996; 34 (2): 61-9. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.34.61
  12. Nakaishi H., Yamada Y. Abnormal tear dynamics and symptoms of eyestrain in operators of visual display terminals. OccupEnviron Med 1999: 56: 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.1.6
  13. Salibello C., Nilsen E. Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995:66 (8): 479-83.
  14. Piccoli B. A critical appraisal of current knowledge and future directions of ergophtalmology: consensus document of the ICOOH Committee on 'Work and vision'. Ergonomics 2003: 46 (4): 384-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000067473
  15. Cole BL. Do video display units cause visual problems? - a bedside story about the processes of public health decision-making. Clin Exp Optom. 2003; 86 (4): 205-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03108.x
  16. Thomson David W. Eye problems and visual display terminals - the facts and the fallacies. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998; 18(2); 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00067-7
  17. Koicheva V, Tsaneva L. Stanchev V. Changes in the functional state of the visual analyzer in operators working with video display terminals. Gig 1? Prof Zabol. 1991; 8: 5-6 (In Russian with English abstract).
  18. Luberto F. Gobba F. Broglia A. Temporary myopia and subjective symptoms in video display terminal operators. Med Lav. 1989; 80 (2): 155-63 (In Italian with English abstract).
  19. Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328 (8): 584-589. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199302253280817
  20. Borodulin-Nadzieja L. Salomon E. Janocha A. The influence of computer work on reaction time and accuracy in VDT operators. Med Pr. 1997; 48 (2): 139-44 (In Polish with English abstract).
  21. Murata K. Araki S. Kawakami N, Saito Y. Hino E. Central nervous system effects and visual fatigue in VDT workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991; 63 (2): 109-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379073
  22. Komiushina T.A. Physiological mechanisms of the etiology of visual fatigue during work involving visual stress. Vestn Oftalmol. 2000:116 (4): 33-6 (In Russian with English abstract).
  23. Sobieszczanska M. Salomon E, Borodulin- Nadzieja L. Pilecki W. Jagielski J. Kalka-Gebala R, Janocha A. Kalka D. The evaluation of central visual fatigue in computer terminal users by visual evoked potentials. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1998: 32 (6): 1369-75 (In Polish with English abstract).
  24. Aaras A., Horgen G., Bjorset HH. et all. Musculosceletal, visual and physiological stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomics interventions. Appl Ergon 1998; 29; 335-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00079-3
  25. Wolkoff P, Skov P, Franck C. Petersen LN. Eye irritation and environmental factors in the office environment-hypotheses. causes and a physiological model. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003;29 (6): 411-30. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.748