You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.


Shydlovska T. A., Shydlovska T. V., Petruk L. G.


SI «Institute of Otolaryngology named after Prof. O. S. Kolomiychenko NAMS of Ukraine», Kiev

Full article (PDF), UKR

Purpose. The problem of diagnosis, prevention and treatment of sensorineural hearing loss (SHL), especially professional, retains much medical and social actuality. On the other hand, fairly significant changes may occur in the auditory analyzer under the influence of strong transient sounds what qualifies as acute acoustic trauma, and in recent years the number of cases increases. Objective. Comparative analysis of the temporal parameters of long­latency auditory evoked potentials (LAEP) in patients with acoustic trauma and «noisy» production workers with sensorineural hearing loss.

Materials and methods. In the work the results of examination of 84 patients with acoustic trauma, 15 healthy as the control group and 15 workers employed on ’noise’ occupations as a comparison group are given. Subjective audiometry was fully carried out by clinical audiometer AC­40 «Interacoustics» (Denmark).

Results. There is no significant difference between the control group and any of the patients groups we studied in LPP components P1, N1. In both groups of patients – people with acoustic trauma and «noisy» production workers – was a significant (P < 0,05) deviation from the reference values of the LPP component N2 LAEP. Thus, after 1 kHz tone stimulatation indices were (284,2 ± 4,1) ms and (273,5 ± 2,9) ms accordingly, and after 4 kHz tone stimulation – (285,9 ± 5,1) ms and (271,1 ± 3,8) ms. And the LPP N2 LAEP indices did not differ significantly among the groups of patients. Also identified a significant (P < 0,05) prolongation of LPP P2 index in the studied patients with acoustic trauma to (181,8 ± 4,6) ms for 1 kHz ipsilateral stimulation, and (188,4 ± 5,3) ms – 4 kHz relevantly to both control and comparison group.

Conclusion. According to AEP identified disorders in the cortical auditory analyzer in «noise» production workers and patients with acoustic trauma indicate the advisability of the study not only the peripheral part of the auditory analyzer, but also central, in particular, its cortical structures. The LP component P2 LAEP increase in patients with acoustic trauma evidences the involvement of the deeper brain structures, which in particular relate to limbic­reticular formation. The LPP component P2 LAEP increase can display the failure of compensatory­adaptive mechanisms in the implementation of stress reactions in response to acoustic trauma.

Key words: sensorineural hearing loss, acoustic trauma, auditory evoked potentials, auditory analyzer


  1. Gapnoyeva, E. T., Kirsanova, E. T. 2006, «Pecul iarities of lesion of the auditory analyzer after mine explosion injury», Vestnik otorinolaringologii, no. 1, pp. 51–54 (in Russian).
  2. Zabolotnyi, D. І., Krasnyuk, D. I., Shydlovska, T. V. 2001, Occupational hearing loss of noise etiology (diagnostics, classification, working capacity examination, prevention), Methodical recommendations, (Ed. Yu. І. Kundієv). Kyiv, 30 p (in Ukrainian).
  3. Zenkov, L. R., Mola-Zade, A. N. 1984, The role of «nonspecific» stem systems in compensation of «specific» sensory functions, 17th Dunaisky Symposium on neuro logical sciences, Abstracts, Moscow, v. 11, pp. 34 (in Russian).
  4. Zenkov, L. R., Ronkin, M. A. 2004, Functional diagnostics of nervous diseases. Moscow : Medpressinform, 488 p. (Russian).
  5. Izotova, V. V., Selezneva, A. B., Dvoryanchikova, V. V. 2009, «Peculiarities of tone audiometry in individuals, exposed to low-frequency acoustic vibrations», Rossiis kaja otorinolaringologija, no. 4 (41), pp. 64–68 (in Russian).
  6. Palchun, V. T., Kunelskaya, N. L., Polyakova, M. 2006, «State of hearing and vestibular analyzers in patients with mine-explosion injury», Vestnik otorinolaringologii, no. 4, pp. 24–26 (in Russian).
  7. Pankova, V. B, Podolskaya, E. V. 1991, «Risk criteria of noise damaging effect on the hearing organ», Vestnik oto ryno laryngologii, no. 2, pp. 30–33 (in Russian).
  8. Pankova, V. B., Novikov, S. V. 1995, «Predicting hearing loss progress of the effect of industrial noise», Vestn. Otorynolaryngologii, no. 1, pp. 17–20 (in Russian).
  9. Shydlovska, T. V., Zabolotnyi, D. I., Shydlovska, T. A. 2006, Sensorineural hearing loss. Kyiv : Logos, 779 p. (in Ukrainian).
  10. Shidlovska, T. V., Yavorovskyi, O. P., Vertelenko, M. V. 2008, «Hearing disorders in receptor and cortical parts of the auditory analyzer under the influence of noise, with account of its intensity and character», Zhurnal vushnykh, nosovykh і gorlovykh khvorob, no. 6, pp. 2–10 (in Ukrainian).
  11. Yavorovskyi, O. P., Shydlovs’ka, T. V.,Vertelenko, M. V., Shevtsova, T. V. 2008, «Hygienic assessment of noise at workplace and characteristics of initial disorders of the auditory analyzer in workers of ’noisy’ professions in aviation machine building», Ukrainian J. Occup Health, no. 3 (5), pp. 63–70 (in Ukrainian).
  12. Almeida, S. I. C., Albernaz, P. L. M., Zaia, P. A. 2000, Noise-related hearing loss risk factors, 4th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Abstracts, no. 1, p. 4.
  13. Davoodi, M. 2010, «Noise-induced hearing loss», Int. J. Occup Environ Med, v. 1 (3), pp. 146.
  14. Lister, J. J., Maxfield, N. D. 2011, «Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: Older adults», In. J. Audiology, no. 50, pp. 211–225.
  15. Michler, S. A., Illing, R. E., Laszig, R. 2000, Expression of plasticity associated proteins is affected by unilanerf noise trauma, 4th European Congress of OtoRhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Abstracts: Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, no. 1 (Suppl. 79), p. 202.
  16. Rabinowitz, P. M., Galusha, D., Kirsche, S. R. et al. 2011, «Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers», Occup Environ Med., v. 68 (6), pp. 414–418.
  17. Thurston, F. E. 2013, «The worker’s ear: a history of noise-induced hearing loss», Am J. Ind Med, v. 56 (3), pp. 367–377.