You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.

DIAGNOSTICS PECULIARITIES OF CHRONIC OCCUPATIONAL LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY

https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2015.01.077

Fartushna O. Y.

DIAGNOSTICS PECULIARITIES OF CHRONIC OCCUPATIONAL LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY

SI "Institute for Occupational Health of NAMS of Ukraine", Kyiv

Full article (PDF), UKR

Background. Occupational chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy is one of the leading causes of persistent disability in the world. Purpose. To study and generate the data of the world literature, covering also personal investigations, regarding the diagnostics peculiarities of occupational chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Methods. An analytical review of scientific publications over the last 10 years, using modern scientometric databases and funds of research libraries in Ukraine, USA, UK.

Results. The article presents current understanding of terminology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical peculiarities, diagnostic methods and formulation of diagnoses, evidence-based medicine.

Conclusions. Occupational chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy is a significant socio-economic problems and the most common reason for seeking medical care in the world. The completeness and accuracy of a clinical diagnosis requires formulation of indication of not only nosology, but also the existing syndromes, the nature and extent of the revealed disorders.

Key words: chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy, occupational pathology, epidemiology, diagnosis, formulation of a diagnosis

References

  1. Vein, A. M. et al. 2001, Pain syndromes in neurological practice. Moscow: MEDpress-Inform. 368 p. (in Russian).
  2. Voznitsyna, K. B. 2007, "Back pain as a problem of occupational pathology (a review)", no. 1 (9), pp. 71-77 (in Russian).
  3. Danilov, A. B., Zharkova, T. R., 2010, "Chronic radiculopathy: new opportunities for therapy", Russian Journal of Medicine, a special issue. Pain,. v. 18, pp. 15-19 (in Russian).
  4. Dubinina, T. V., Yeliseyev, M. S. 2011, "Pain in the lower back: prevalence, causes, diagnostics, treatment", Neurology, neuropsychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, no. 1, pp. 22-26 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2011-129
  5. Jerusalimskiy, A. P. 2008, "To the problem of formulating a clinical diagnosis in neurology", J. neuropathol. and psychiat., no. 5, pp. 105-106 (in Russian).
  6. Kosarev, V. V., Babanov, S. A. 2013, "Occupational dorsopathies: a modern approach to pharmacotherapy of a pain syndrome", Meditsinsky sovet, no. 3, pp. 82- 92 (in Russian).
  7. Kosarev, V. V., Babanov, S. A. 2010, Occupational diseases. Moscow : GEOTAR Media (in Russian).
  8. Levin, O. S. 2010, "Vertebrogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy", Farmateka, v. 13, pp. 26-33 (in Russian).
  9. International Classification of Diseases, 1998, ICDH.-Geneva: WHO, v. 1, (Part 2), pp. 25-31 (in Russian).
  10. Parfenov, V. A. 2004, "Diagnosis and treatment in back pains", Rus. Med. J, v. 12, no. 2, p. 202 (in Russian).
  11. Penina, G. O. Zaslavsky, S. N. 2006, "Occupationalonal lumbosacral radiculopathy in Komi Republic: structure, clinical electrophysiology", Bulletin of East-Siberian Scientific Center of the Academy of Medical Sciences, no.. 3, pp. 102- 105 (in Russian).
  12. Podchufarova, E. V. 2003, "Chronic back pains: pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment", Rus.med. J., v. 11, no. 25, pp. 32-37 (in Russian).
  13. Bener, A. et al. 2013, "An Epidemiologic Analysis of Low Back Pain in Primary Care. A Hot Humid Country and Global Comparison", Journal of primary care & community health, no. 4 (3), pp. 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131913479385
  14. Besen, E., Young, A. E., Shaw, W. S. 2014, "Returning to Work Following Low Back Pain: Towards a Model of Individual Psychosocial Factors", Journal of occupational rehabilitation, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9522-9
  15. Bhatt, B., Seema, M. S. 2012, "Occupational Health Hazards: A Study of Bus Drivers" , Journal of Health Management, v. 14, no. 2, pp. 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/097206341201400209
  16. Buchbinder, R., Blyth, F. M., March, L. M. et al. 2013, Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol., v. 27, no. 5, pp. 575-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2013.10.007
  17. Costa, L. C. M. et al. 2013, "Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update", Spine, v. 38, no. 2, pp. 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318267a92f
  18. Deyo, R. A., Jarvik, J. G., Chou, R. 2014, "Low back pain in primary care", BMJ, v. 349, pp. g4266. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4266
  19. Driscoll, T. et al. 2014, "The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study", Annals of the rheumatic diseases, v. 73, no. 6, pp. 975-981. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204631
  20. Eyb, R., Grabmeier, G. 2014, "Strategies for Low Back Pain", European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology: The EFORT Textbook, pp. 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_35
  21. Ferguson, F., Holdsworth, L., Rafferty, D. 2010, "Low back pain and physiotherapy use of red flags: the evidence from Scotland", Physiotherapy, v. 96, no. 4, pp. 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.01.001
  22. Ganasegeran, K., Perianayagam, W., Nagaraj, P., Al-Dubai, S. A. 2014, "Psycho-behavioural risks of low back pain in railway workers", Occupational Medicine, v. 64, no. 5, pp. 372-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu039
  23. Graves, J. M. et al. 2012, "Factors associated with early magnetic resonance imaging utilization for acute occupational low back pain: a population-based study from Washington State workers’ compensation", Spine, v. 37, no. 19, pp. 1708-1718. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823a03cc
  24. Graves, J. M. et al. 2014, "Health care utilization and costs associated with adherence to clinical practice guidelines for early magnetic resonance imaging among workers with acute occupational low back pain", Health services research, v. 49, no. 2, pp. 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12098
  25. Greene, G. 2001, "Red Flags": essential factors in recognizing serious spinal pathology", Manual therapy, v. 6, no. 4, pp. 253-255. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.2001.0423