1(38) 2014

DOI xxxxxxxx

Leonenko N. S., Demetska O. V., Tkachenko T. Yu, Leonenko O. B.


SI «Institute for Occupational Health of NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv

Full article (PDF), ENG

Background. Today the study of toxicity of nanoparticles of different elements is of primary significance, as 1) a growing number of workers contact professionally with nanomaterials; 2) the number of nanotechnology products is growing up, which, in turn, are spread widely among consumers and can cause adverse effects on human health and the environment. Toxicological properties of nanoparticles, in turn, are determined by chemical and physical properties, including geometric characteristics: shape, critical diameter, crystal lattice parameters, etc.
Objective. To investigate the effect of geometry (shape, size) of silver nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity.
Materials and methods. Silver nanoparticles of different shape (sphere, decahedron, triangle) and size (13, 20, 40 nm), stabi-lized by carboxylates, have been used. A particle size was determined, using Analysette 12 Dynasizer (Fritch, Germany). The cytotoxicity was studied, using toxicity analyzer AT-05 (Russia).
Results. It was established that 40 nm spherical as well as 40 nm decahedral silver nanoparticles in native form did not dem-onstrate any cytotoxicity. It is determined that 17 nm spherical silver nanoparticles are more toxic than 17 nm decahedral ones, as they show a cytotoxic effect in the concentration, in which decaehedral are not toxic. It is found that 20 nm trian-gular silver particles show a cytotoxic effect in 1:10 dilution and no effect in 1:1 dilution.
Conclusion. The geometry of nanoparticles, their shape and size (critical diameter), in particular, is one of important deter-minants of their toxicity, which should be taken into consideration in risk assessment. In this, there are not any general regu¬lations concerning their effect on toxic properties of nanoparticles. So, their interrelations should be established individually in each specific case.

Key words: silver nanoparticles,critical diameter of nanoparticles, cytotoxicity


  1. Vakhrushev, A. A., Fedotov, A. Yu., Shushkov, A. A., Shushkov, A. V. 2011, «Modeling metal nanoparticle formation, studying structural, physicochemical properties of nanoparticles and nanocomposites», Proceedings of TulSU. Natural Sciences, no. 2, pp. 241­253 (in Russian).
  2. Khamidulina, H. H., Davydova, Yu. O. 2011, «International approaches to assessment of toxicity and hazards of nanoparticles and nanomaterials», Toksikologichesky vestnik, no. 6, pp. 53-57 (in Russian).
  3. Balbus, J. M., Maynard, A. D., Colvin, V. L. 2007, «Meeting Report: Hazard assessment for nanoparticles - Report from an interdisciplinary Workshop», Envir. Health Persp., Vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1664-1669.
  4. George, S., Lin, Z. Ji, Thomas, C. R. 2012, «Surface defects on plate-shaped silver nanoparticles contribute to its hazard potential in a fish gill cell line and zebrafish embryos», ACS Nano, Vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 3745-3759.
  5. Bokyung, Kong, Ji Hyun Seog. 2011, «Experimental considerations on the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles», Nanomedicine (Lond), Vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 929-941.
  6. Lee, N. 2012, «Nanotechnology and occupational health in Korea», Asian - Pacific Newslett on Occup Health and Safety, no. 19, pp. 60-61.
  7. Liu, G. 2013, «Delineating the pathways for the site- directed synthesis of individual nanoparticles on surfaces», PNAS, no. 110, pp. 887-891.
  8. Sun, Y. N., Sun, Y. N., Wang, C. D., Zhang, X. M. 2011, «Shape dependence of gold nanoparticles on in vivo acute toxicological effects and biodistribution», J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol, Vol.11, no. 2, pp. 1210-1216.
  9. Sur, I. 2010, «Interaction of multi-functional silver nanoparticles with living cells», Nanotechnology, Vol .21, no. 17, p. 175104.
  10. http://sfiz.ru/page.php?al=uchenye_vyjasnili_ chto_f
  11. http://www.pnas.org