2(30) 2012

DOI xxxxxxxx

Kalnysh V. V.

TO THE PROBLEM OF IMPROVING THE HYGIENIC CLASSIFICATION ON ASSESSMENT OF WORK STRAIN

SI «Institute for Occupational Health of NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv

Full article (PDF), RUS

The experience of more than 26-year use of the Hygienic Classification in the assessment of the work strain showed the usefulness of the mentioned normative document as applied to workers of different professions, using a universal scale. Over that period there has been made a great success in engineering and technologies, promoting to reveal a number of shortcomings and debatable questions in the practical use of the Classification and in defining rates of the work strain. So, at present, there is a burning need to review some clauses of the Hygienic Classification and to conduct a wide discussion on the touched questions, which can result not only in modification of the mentioned normative document, but also, in elaboration of similar methodical materials for its use.

Key words: Hygienic Classification, work strain, signal, complication, responsibility, concentrated examination, industrial subject, emotional load

References

    1. Aleksyeyeva T V. Filosofsko-psykholohichni pidkhody do vyznachennya fenomena vidpovidalnosti osobystosti / T V. Aleksyeyeva // Problemy zahalnoyi ta pedahohichnoyi psykholohiyi.- 2011.- T KHIII.- Ch. 1.- S. 9-18.
    2. Anokhin P. K. Printsipial'nyye voprosy obshchey teorii funktsional'nykh sistem / P. K. Anokhin // Printsipy sistemnoy organizatsii funktsiy.- M.: Nauka, 1973.- S. 5-61.
    3. Anokhin P. K. Teoriya funktsional'noy sistemy / P. K. Anokhin // Uspekhi fiziol. nauk.- 1970.- T 1, No 1.- S. 19-54.
    4. Bauyer F. L. Informatika / F. L. Bauyer, G. Gooz.- CH. 1.- M.: “Mir”.- 1990.- 332 s.
    5. Bulatnikov I. Ye. Problemy i opyt razvitiya otvetstvennogo otnosheniya budushchikh spetsialistov- transportnikov k professional'noy deyatel'nosti: chto mozhet vospitaniye? / I. Ye. Bulatnikov // Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy poisk.- 2010.- No 2 (14).- S. 146-159.
    6. Gavrilushkin S. A. Otvetstvennost' kak professional'noye kachestvo lichnosti / S. A. Gavrilushkin // Vektor nauki TGU- 2005.- No 1 (15).- S. 155-157.
    7. Hihiyenichna klasyfikatsiya pratsi za pokaznykamy shkidlyvosti ta nebezpechnosti faktoriv vyrobnychoho seredovyshcha, vazhkosti ta napruzhenosti trudovoho protsesu,- MOZ Ukrainy, nakaz vid 27.12.2001, No 528.2001.- 46 s.
    8. GOST 25902-83. Zritel'nyye zaly. Metod opredeleniya razborchivosti rechi. Deystvuyet s 01.01.1984.
    9. GOST 51061-97. Sistemy nizkoskorostnoy peredachi po tsifrovym kanalam. Parametry kachestva rechi i metody izmereniy.- M.- 24 s. Deystvuyet s 01.01.1998.
    10. Yena T A. Hihiyenichna i psykhofiziolohichna otsinka profesiynoyi diyalʹnosti dyspetcheriv enerhosystem / T A. Yena // Ukr. zhurn. z probl. medytsyny pratsi.- 2008.- No 1 (13).- S. 13-19.
    11. Yefremova O. S. Attestatsiya rabochikh mest po usloviyam truda v organizatsiyakh: rekomendatsii i nor- mativnyye dokumenty / O. S. Yefremova.- M.: Izd-vo “Al'fa-Press”.- 2009.- 640 s.
    12. Zolina Z. M. O klassifikatsii i kriteriyakh otsenki truda po stepeni tyazhesti i napryazhennosti / Zolina Z. M., Gorshkov S. I. // Rukovodstvo po fiziologii truda.- M.: Meditsina, 1983.- S. 482-498.
    13. Karpov A. V. Psikhologiya menedzhmenta / V. Karpov.- M.: Gardariki, 2004.- 584 s.
    14. Kachestvo produktsii, ispytaniya, sertifikatsiya. Terminologiya: Spravochnoye posobiye.- Vyp. 4.- M.: Izdatel'stvo standartov, 1989.- 14 s.
    15. Kogan V. Z. Marshrut v stranu informologiyu / Z. Kogan.- M.: Nauka, 1985.- 160 s.
    16. Kratkiy psikhologicheskiy slovar'.- M.: Politizdat, 1985.- 431 s.
    17. Meskon M. KH. Osnovy menedzhmenta / Meskon M. KH., Al'bert M., Khedouri F.- M.: “Delo”, 1992.702 s.
    18. Medvedev V. I. Psikhofiziologicheskiye problemy optimizatsii deyatel'nosti / V. I. Medvedev // Fiziologicheskiye mekhanizmy optimizatsii deyatel'nosti.- L.: Nauka, 1985.- S. 3-20.
    19. Medvedev V. I. Problemy fiziologicheskogo normirovaniya / V. I. Medvedev // Fiziologicheskoye normirovaniye trudovoy deyatel'nosti.- L.: Nauka, 1988.- S. 3-17.
    20. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya: “Otsenka tyazhesti i napryazhennosti trudovogo protsessa” / O. K. Kolesnik.- Ukhta: Ukhtinskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet, 2010.- 42 s..
    21. Mitchem K. Chto takoye filosofiya tekhniki? / K. Mitchem.- M.: Aspekt Press, 1995.- 149 s.
    22. Navakatikyan A. O. Psikhofiziologicheskiye mekhanizmy i kriterii napryazhennosti umstvennogo truda / A. O. Navakatikyan // Fiziologicheskiye osnovy povysheniya effektivnosti truda.- L.: Nauka, 1978.- S. 98-117.
    23. Nyzhnekevych Z. Yak vykhovuvaty u molodshykh shkolyariv vidpovidalne stavlennya do navchannya / Z. Nyzhnekevych.- Ivano-Frankivsk, 2000.- 87 s.
    24. Ponomarenko A. M. Vdoskonalennya hihiyenichnykh zasad otsinky vplyvu umov pratsi na zdorov'ya hirnykiv na osnovi kontseptsiyi “pryynyatnoho ryzyku” / Ponomarenko A. M., Perederiy H. S., Mukhin V. V. // Ukr. zhurn. z probl. medytsyny pratsi.- 2009.- No 4 (21).- S. 23-31.
    25. Solovjov O.I. (2010), “Peculiarities of hygienic assessment of work conditions for workers with different types of work activity”, Ukrainian Journal of Occupational Health, 4 (24), 3-10.
    26. Suvorov N. F. Psikhofiziologicheskiye mekhanizmy izbiratel'nogo vnimaniya / N. F. Suvorov, O. P. Tairov.- L.: Nauka, 1985.- 287 s.
    27. Teoriya upravleniya. Terminologiya.- Vyp. 107.- M.: Nauka, 1988.- 56 s.
    28. Tkachov A. V. Problema profesiynoyi vidpovidalnosti osobystosti v psykholohiyi / Tkachov A. V. // Problemy ekstremalnoyi ta kryzovoyi psykholohiyi.- 2010.- Vyp. 8.- S. 393-399.
    29. Usov V. N. Obuslovlennost' otvetstvennykh upravlencheskikh resheniy filosofskoy refleksiyey / Usov V. N. // Vestnik Chelyab. gos. un-ta.- Ser. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Kul'turologiya.- 2008.- Vyp. 5.- No 10.- S. 68-80.
    30. Fedosov B. T. Teoriya avtomaticheskogo upravleniya i smezhnyye voprosy // http://model.exponenta.ru..
    31. Khananashvili M. M. Informatsionnyye nevrozy / M. M. Khananashvili.- L.: Meditsina, 1978.- 144 s.
    32. ANSI S3.2 (R1999).Method for measurement the Intelligibility of Speech over Communication Systems.
    33. ANSI S3.5-1997 (R2007).Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index.
    34. IEC 268-16 MEK 268-16. Oborudovaniye zvukovykh sistem. Chast' 16. Ob"yektivnaya otsenka razborchivosti rechi v pomeshcheniyakh po metodu RASTI.
    35. ISO/TR-4870:1991. The construction and calibration of speech intelligibility tests.
    36. Thelin A. G. Working environment condition in rural areas according to psychosocial indices // Ann Agric Environ Med., 1998.- No 5.- Р. 139-145.